Powered By Blogger

Search This Blog

Saturday, August 27, 2011

UFC Rio Will Okami's Training With Sonnen Help Him Unravel The Spider's Web? Shogun Rua vs Griffin Rematch

Post your predictions for UFC Rio & like our pages to win stuff & get discounts & news!  Our Samurai Shogun Shirt is on sale for our fans. www.facebook.com/MMAMaxim We also have equipment used by many UFC Fighters like UFC Champ Anderson Silva www.Facebook.com/MaximFitnessEquipment



















Silva vs Okami Headlines UFC RIO LIVE Tonight in Brazil!
Anderson Silva defends the middleweight title against the last man to defeat him, Yushin Okami - plus former 205-lb. champ Shogun Rua looks to avenge his 2007 loss against Forrest Griffin, and Minotauro Nogueira battles in Brazil for the first time against Brendan Schaub - UFC RIO live at 9pm ET / 6pm PT on Pay-Per-View & UFC.TV

 


Tavares vs Fisher, Palhares vs Miller Live Tomorrow Night
Prelim action leads right up to the Pay-Per-View event, starting at 8pm ET / 5pm PT on SPIKE & Rogers Sportsnet

See The UFC RIO Prelims Live on Facebook Starting At 6pm ET / 3pm PT
"Like" the UFC on Facebook to see five bouts live & free tomorrow night!

Thursday, August 18, 2011

MMA Business: UFC Competes With Boxing Live On Nov. 12! Fox Executives Admit Major Sponsors Fully Support MMA

UFC Signs Seven year Deal with Fox set beginning Sat. Nov 12, 2011 at 6PM PT in Anaheim.  This date will also have a boxing fight featuring Manny Pacquiao.  UFC President Dana White admits no details have been set on whom will fight.  White stated Zuffa's "UFC will change everything with Fox."  UFC will show Fight Nights on Big Fox.  Zuffa executive Lorenzo Fertitta stated "we picked Fox as the natural home for the UFC" as they dominate the international and domestic U.S. market in action sports. 

Twenty-four live UFC fights on Fox to "catapult the pay-per-view PPV"  Fox Executive Frank Hill states they wish they received $90 million for the deal but will not state the exact amount. Fox Sports Media Group executive Eric Shanks stated "eighty percent overlap in the 18-34 male demographic between fans of the UFC and Fox."

UFC Official Press Release

UFC & FOX PACK PERFECT PUNCH

FOX SPORTS MEDIA GROUP REACHES MULTI-YEAR, MULTI-MEDIA RIGHTS AGREEMENT WITH ULTIMATE FIGHTING CHAMPIONSHIP

FOX to Broadcast Four Fights Annually Beginning November 2011

The Ultimate Fighter, Featuring a New Format, Moves to FX
Today, Ultimate Fighting Championship® (UFC), the world’s leading mixed martial arts organization and No. 1 Pay-Per-View event provider in the world, finds its perfect media match in FOX, the No. 1 television network in the country. FOX Sports Media Group, the umbrella entity representing FOX Networks Group’s wide array of sports platforms, has reached a multi-year, multi-media rights agreement with Zuffa, LLC, owner of the UFC brand.

The landmark agreement, which puts UFC on par with many of the country’s professional sports organizations, delivers four live events in prime time or late night each year to the FOX broadcast network, home to the country’s biggest sports events, including the Super Bowl, World Series and Daytona 500. The first live event airs Saturday, Nov. 12 at 9:00 PM ET/6:00 PM PT. Additional programming on multiple FOX networks launches January 2012 and includes live fights, pre and post shows, countdown shows, UFC Unleashed, UFC Primetime, the UFC Knockout series, Best of Pride, weigh-in specials, and much more original content from extensive Zuffa archives.  The agreement also provides for developing robust mobile and authenticated online offerings to exploit a vast array of digital platform rights.

In spring 2012, THE ULTIMATE FIGHTER, UFC's signature weekly reality show moves to FX, FOX's general entertainment cable network now in more than 99 million homes.  With the move to FX, the show will feature a newly-designed format. FX is also set to televise another four-to six-live UFC events annually, with a mixture of additional events and programs heading to FSMG cable networks including FUEL TV.

“We’re excited to be part of the FOX family,” says Dana White, UFC President.   “The UFC is finally where it belongs on the number one network in the country and aligned with the most prestigious sports properties in the world.  I’ve always said that the UFC will be the biggest sport in the world and with this relationship it will become a reality.”

“My brother Frank, Dana and I always believed that our passion for the sport of Mixed Martial Arts would help us to build the UFC into a successful global brand and ultimately make it one of the premier sports properties in the world,” said Lorenzo Fertitta, Chairman and CEO of the UFC.  “The partnership with FOX is a major step in making this a reality and also builds on the great relationship that we already have established with FOX in Latin America, Australia and Europe.”

“Mixed martial arts is not only the fastest growing sport in the world, but also the world’s most exciting form of man-to-man competition, and the UFC is the world’s premier MMA organization,” said FSMG President & Co-COO Eric Shanks.  “Since FOX Sports is America’s No. 1 sports network and FOX is America’s No. 1 network for young adults, the UFC on FOX is a perfect match.”

“UFC’s growth over the past decade is nothing short of phenomenal and it has become one of the marquee sports in this country,” said John Landgraf, President and General Manager, FX Networks.  “There is a reason for its rising popularity.  It features some of the greatest athletes in the world, and we believe it will be a terrific addition to our schedule and look forward to our relationship.”



Remember Shark Fights 19 is on tomorrow. 
Promote Your Brand In Over 30 Million Homes With Fox Fuel TV! Sponsorship Opportunities Available Tailored To Your Budget!

Want to align your brand with the leader in action sports that the UFC selected?   Your brand can be promoted on Fox Fuel TV and Shark Fights in over 30 million homes.   We have amazing opportunities to be on Fox Fuel TV that can be tailored to your budget.  
For more information see:
http://mmafightingwords.blogspot.com/2011/07/mma-maxim-forging-strategic-partnership.html





Sunday, August 14, 2011

MMA Trainer Shawn Tompkins Died. Our Sincere Condolences and Gratitude To Shawn For Improving Our MMA Training

MMA Trainer Shawn Tompkins died as confirmed by his manager to us.  Our thoughts and prayers go to his family and close friends! Thanks for introducing us to some amazing fitness training equipment and techniques Shawn. We will think of you whenever we train. www.Facebook.com/MaximFitnessEquipment





Monday, August 8, 2011

MMA Fighter Training Videos For Shark Fights 19 On Aug. 19! Sponsorship Opportunities On Fox Fuel TV Tailored To Your Budget Still Available!

MMA Maxim Went To LegendsMMA Gym in Hollywood, CA to meet the amazing staff there and provide equipment for their fighters competing at Shark Fights 19.

Shark Fights Arrives in Nevada on Friday, August 19- 7:00PM PT / Doors open at 6:00PM PT


John Ascuaga's Nugget Casino Resort; Sparks, NV



In the main event, coming off of a 15 month layoff before his submission victory over Jai Bradney in March, popular Ultimate Fighter 8 and UFC vet "Sugar" Shane Nelson (13-5) looks to lengthen his winning streak. Nelson holds notable wins over George Roop and a 44 second TKO win over Aaron Riley in the UFC. His opponent, former King of the Cage Champion Aaron "Slam" Wetherspoon (8-3), holds notable victories over Jeremiah Metcalf, Laverne Clark, and Thomas Kenny. In February, coming off of his own 2 year layoff, Wetherspoon returned to MMA with a decision victory over Nick Reale.

In the co-main event, on a 3-fight win streak with a recent submission win over King of the Cage Champion Tony Lopez, 6'6" Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu Black Belt sensation Ricky "Ice Cold" Shivers (10-5-1) tests his ground skills against the hard-hitting, fast rising super-star Emanual "Hardcore Kid" Newton (15-6-1). Newton, on a 3-fight win streak of his own, comes in to Shark Fights 18 with a hard fought decision victory over Ilir Latifi at Shark Fights 17.
Join us on Friday, August 19- 7:00PM PT / Doors open at 6:00PM PT





Fight Card and Location subject to change.

MMA Maxim Training Videos with Fighters from Legends MMA gym in Hollywood, CA.





Fedor Emelianenko Not Retiring After Strikeforce-Zuffa Did Not Renew His Contract

Fedor Emelianenko Not Hanging Up His Gloves!  Should Fedor retire or redeem himself after three losses?

Admired Heavyweight Fighter Will Continue Fighting Despite Not Having His Contract Renewed by Strikeforce-Zuffa LLC Executives.


Check out our new fan page customization and tell us if we should call Fedor's management team to get him this equipment? www.Facebook.com/MaximFitn​essEquipment

M-1 Global Press Announcement:

New York, NY. (August 8, 2011) Still possessing a champion’s heart and desire to compete, Fedor Emelianenko (31-4, 1 NC) has elected not to retire; his next opponent and date are to be determined with the bout likely slated to take place in Russia.

M-1 Global President and co-founder Vadim Finkelstein confirmed ‘The Last Emperor’s’ decision and shared his immediate plans for Europe’s leading mixed martial arts promotion.

“We consulted with Fedor and it was decided that he should not leave the sport in this way. His friends and past opponents support Fedor in continuing his career and he agreed,” said Finkelstein. “We want to organize a fight for Fedor in Russia and have already begun working in this direction. If everything goes as planned, we will produce a card in Moscow or St. Petersburg sometime in the fall with Fedor as the main event.” The opponent is yet to be determined.

More plans are also in the mix according to Finkelstein, “In addition to the fight in Russia, we’re also working with our Japanese contacts to organize a New Year’s Eve event in Japan that Fedor would participate in as well.”

When asked about 2012 Finkelstein spoke optimistically; “If all is successful, in 2012 we’ll be back in the U.S. All these ideas are being developed right now and we want to work exactly according to this plan.”

Saturday, August 6, 2011

UFC President Dana White Rebutted By Former Strikeforce Champ Marloes Coenen

Golden Glory fighters were all released from Strikeforce fights by Zuffa, LLC. Golden Glory manages former Strikeforce Heavyweight Champion Alistair Overeem, Valentijn Overeem, John Olav Einemo, and former Strikeforce champion Marloes Coenen. UFC President White stated that Golden Glory (GG) refuses to adhere to athletic commission rules in the U.S. that require fighters be paid directly. White explained that Golden Glory refused to have fighters paid directly instead of GG dispersing earnings. Thus, Zuffa executives released all their fighters pending GG's acceptance of those terms. GG's only fighter not to be released is Sergei Kharitonov whom is still in the Strikeforce Grand Prix Tournament.

Former Strikeforce champion Marloes Coenen responded with a picture of this check from Zuffa made out to her directly.

Coenen fights back, shows check to her from Zuffa

White responded that the check was only cut that way because the UFC and Strikeforce insisted that it be done that way to fall in line with state commissions rules.

Friday, August 5, 2011

Association of Combat Sports Commission’s Annual Convention Changes To MMA & Muay Thai


2011 ABC Report on the Half Point MMA Scoring System
New Logo with Boxing & MMA Gloves



The Association of Boxing Commissions (ABC) holds annual conventions, and last year veteran MMA referee and judge Nelson "Doc" Hamilton presented the Half-Point Scoring System as an alternative to the Ten Point Must. A Scoring Committee was then formed to explore the merits of the system and report their findings the following year.

If you're not familiar with the innovative ideas associated with the Half-Point System -- such as the broader gradient of available scores, the referee signaling a near-submission, or the role of the additional fourth judge -- you should be. I suggest reading Doc Hamilton's theory about the existing problems with MMA judging and how the Half-Point System would offer the freedom "to score bouts in a manner that accurately reflects the qualitative difference between the combatants."

The 2011 ABC convention concluded last weekend and I just received a copy of the Scoring Committee's analysis of the Half-Point System. I'm encouraged by the results. The report lays out the positive and negative aspects of each individual component of the system, and their findings indicate a very logical and realistic stance on the judging predicament overall. The entire report is posted in the full entry, but first, I'll extract and compile what I feel are the most noteworthy parts.

Two aspects of the Half-Point System that I'm adamantly opposed to were both shot down by the committee: the referee signaling a near-submission and the addition of a fourth judge. In the event of a draw, this "table judge" would appoint a winner by tallying up scores that are derived from a rigid point system. The reasons these two components were nixed mirror my opinions precisely.

The first of the three issues raised in having the ref signal a near-submission is:
a) The Referee's primary responsibility is for the safety of the fighters. By adding this additional role, the committee felt that this had the potential of affecting the referee's ability to stay focused on the task of administering the primary mandate, that is, fighter protection. As a general rule the more complex you make a task the greater the chance for failure.

Two of the three justifications for eliminating the table judge to break draws by tabulating points are:
a) The Committee felt that having a 4th judge decide a contest based on different judging criteria might create additional problems, the point being that athletes are used to certain judging criteria and then are being judged on a different criteria to break the ties.

c) Currently athletic Commissions are having a difficult time finding qualified judges to fill the three positions, much less finding additional qualified personnel to fill this fourth spot.

Cue the applause. I could not have summarized the concerns better. The influence of the media in the Stakeholder Questionnaire and the passage on draws are also worth noting, but these two poignant observations in the Additional Comments section show an honest assessment that most fans will agree with.
·       The Committee felt that whether the current 10 point system remains intact or the proposed ½ point system (or any variations thereof) is adopted that MMA officials are still lacking in an overall understanding of the sport. As one committee member stated "the ½ point system will not make a bad judge a better judge."
·         The Committee also felt that a more defined scoring system should be adopted with respect to judging, which would enhance MMA judges with respect to their decisions.




Association of Boxing Commissions
½ Point MMA Judging Committee
2011 Report
Washington DC Annual Conference

MMA Committee on Judging:
Chair Jeff Mullen

Members
Aaron Davis Ed Garner
Dale Kliparchuk 
Josef Mason
Todd Neal 
Terry Smith
Dr. Joseph Cooper

Overview:
In July of 2010 at the Association of Boxing Commissions annual conference in New Orleans a committee was struck to examine MMA judging.

The purpose of this committee was to examine a proposal made by Nelson "Doc" Hamilton to the ABC on the use of the ½ point judging system for MMA.

Hamilton proposed a scoring system based on breaking the scoring down to half-points, where a close round, a solid win, a dominant win and having the opponent on the verge of defeat could all be differentiated.
Under this system, if a fighter wins a round that's difficult to call, it gets scored 10-9.5. When it's clear that one fighter won the round, it's 10-9. When a fighter dominates the round but doesn't have his opponent in bad shape during the round, or if a fighter does major damage but the opponent gets a degree of offense in, that would be a 10-8.5. A 10-8 round or lower would be similar to how things are scored today.
Under Hamilton's system, the referee would also be involved in calling catches or submission attempts during the course of the bout. There would also be a 4th judge implemented in the event of draws, which under the ½ point system would have a great likelihood of occurring.

Committee Objectives:
The goal of the committee was to explore Hamilton's system to determine if this system could be implemented by the majority of Athletic Commissions that make up the Association of Boxing Commissions membership and to see if this new MMA scoring system would be an improvement on the current 10 point system which most Commissions use today. A report would be submitted a year later at the next ABC annual meeting in Washington D.C.

The Committee met via conference calls several times with detailed agenda issues.

Stakeholder Questionnaire:
The committee decided to get input from select stakeholders (Promoters, sanctioning groups etc.) in the MMA industry regarding judging issues that were facing the industry.

The committee sent out email correspondence to these stakeholders and asked for their responses in a questionnaire. Some stakeholders responded while others did not.
*An attached questionnaire is included at the end of this report for ABC member perusal.

Committee ½ Point Evaluation:
Hamilton's model was viewed in its entirety and then broken down into components.
The committee identified two issues (see below) with respect to Hamilton's system which were potentially problematic if they were to be implemented.

The other issue which was identified by the committee was ensuring that the ½ point system was given a fair evaluation. The system as a whole had many components (referee involvement, 4th judge etc.), and by implementing all of those components the committee felt it would be difficult to identify which one or ones were responsible for the success or failure of the system.

In essence the committee felt that by testing one variable at a time versus multi-variable testing, this would allow a better evaluation and a more accurate measure of the results.

In summary, the committee discussed several of the key variables in Hamilton's model and identified which had the best chance of being implemented and adopted by Athletic Commissions and accepted in the industry as a whole.

The following are two components of the ½ point system which were discussed by the committee and were voted not to be implemented and the subsequent reasoning.

1. Referee being involved in calling catches / attempted submissions
The Committee unanimously voted against this option for the following reasons:

a) The Referee's primary responsibility is for the safety of the fighters. By adding this additional role, the committee felt that this had the potential of affecting the referee's ability to stay focused on the task of administering the primary mandate, that is, fighter protection. As a general rule the more complex you make a task the greater the chance for failure.

b) Many referees' still lack the skills to identify the techniques and positions found within MMA. As such the committee felt even if a referee was tasked with this mandate, many referees would still not be able to adequately perform this task, and would either miss catches or identify wrong catches altogether, further creating problems with the judging.

c) The Committee acknowledged that some referees would have the skills and abilities to perform (a) and (b), however, the majority of officials would not be able to do so.

2. Table judge (4th judge) to be assigned to all MMA matches.
The Committee unanimously voted against this option for the following reasons:

a) The Committee felt that having a 4th judge decide a contest based on different judging criteria might create additional problems, the point being that athletes are used to certain judging criteria and then are being judged on a different criteria to break the ties.

b) The Committee felt that athletic commissions would not favor the implantation of a 4th judge when traditionally the 3 judge system has been used, and Commissions have designed much of their existing protocols on the 3 judge system.

c) Currently athletic Commissions are having a difficult time finding qualified judges to fill the three positions, much less finding additional qualified personnel to fill this fourth spot.

Draws:
The committee identified the strong possibility that fights ending in a draw would be more common. The committee discussed this issue and came to no conclusions as to how this could or should be handled. Opinions varied as to whether having more draws would even be an issue.

It was ultimately decided that this issue would be left up to the ABC collective membership as a whole for a detailed discussion if this system were to be implemented.

Conclusion:
The committee felt that before any new system was to be implemented, that it would have to go through an extensive evaluation phase where the new system was used during the course of normal MMA events: For this to occur several Athletic Commissions would need to volunteer their services and implement this system (or the adapted system - minus the referee involvement and table judge), into their existing judging model and Commission protocols.

The committee felt that this step would require detailed discussions with the entire ABC membership as many jurisdictions and legislation would be affected by the implementation of the new system. Additionally some promotions and athletes may be affected if they were used to field test the system.

The committee acknowledges that specific evaluation criteria would have to be developed and maintained so that Commissions could ensure that the system was in fact being evaluated in a consistent and fair manner, and not in a haphazard way.
As a result the committee has decided to present their findings at the ABC conference and discuss with the ABC membership the next direction (if any) that should be taken with the possible implementation of the ½ point system.
The committee may oversee and investigate the results of Athletic Commissions who volunteer for the evaluation phase as a possible option.
*Note: The ½ point system and evaluated is being used by CAMO in California.

Additional Comments:
The committee also acknowledged that some officials currently being used by Athletic Commissions do not have a strong understanding of MMA, and this has contributed to the issues and concerns of MMA judging. The committee recognizes that each jurisdiction is ultimately responsible for the hiring and training of their officials and can only make recommendations.

The Committee felt that whether the current 10 point system remains intact or the proposed ½ point system (or any variations thereof) is adopted that MMA officials are still lacking in an overall understanding of the sport. As one committee member stated "the ½ point system will not make a bad judge a better judge."
There are currently several ABC recognized training programs on the market and many Athletic Commissions routinely conduct in house training to offset these ABC training programs. The committee felt this was a positive step in the right direction in improving the judging with MMA.

The committee felt that new individuals being hired as judges should receive adequate training and if possible receive both mentorship and experience from amateur events where they can hone their skills as a judge.
The Committee also felt that a more defined scoring system should be adopted with respect to judging, which would enhance MMA judges with respect to their decisions.

Special Acknowledgment:
The Committee acknowledges Nelson "Doc" Hamilton who has put together a detailed program in an effort to help the issues facing MMA judging, and who has been strong supporter of the MMA community.

*Attachments: MMA Stakeholder Questionnaire form:
Questions:
1. Do you feel that there are issues with the current MMA judging system (the 10 point must system)? If so explain.

2. Has your organization been affected by what you perceive as substandard judging?

3. Do you agree with the recent media reports suggesting that the judging in MMA needs to be changed and/or improved? Explain

4. Are you familiar with the ½ point judging system being proposed?

5. Would you support a new judging system, such as the ½ point system which allows for a greater division of points to be given?

6. The committee has identified that the ½ point system may result in more bouts being decided as draws. Will this be an issue with your organization and if so can you recommend any solutions as a way of solving this issue.

7. Can you foresee any other problems if the ½ point judging system were to be implemented.

8. If the ½ point system were to be implemented would your organization be willing to cooperate and be used to trial test this system at some of your events.

9. Are there any comments or concerns specific to MMA judging that you would like to comment on which would help Commissions improve judging.


Update (8-2-11): I've just been notified that more information may arise from the ABC on this topic. I incorrectly mentioned above that the annual convention had concluded, when in fact the final session will take place on Wednesday, August 3rd, and the Scoring Committee is scheduled to address the group in the morning.

ABC Annual Conference, Day 3
 |  source: The Underground |

ABC Annual Conference, Day 3
Wednesday was the third day of the Association of Boxing Commission’s annual convention. The day was entirely given over to Mixed Martial Arts.
Several key committees gave reports.
--
Mma Training Committee
Chaired by Nick Lembo, NJ
Added Kevin McDonald and Mario Yamasaki as ABC approved trainers. They  are each now approved as trainers for both reffing and judging.
--
Muay Thai Unified Rules Committee
Chaired by Nick Lembo, NJ
Lembo conveyed to the membership his deep understanding and appreciation of Muay Thai, detailing for them areas where Muay Thai is uniquely different from kickboxing, including: 
Time limit on ram Muay:
Necessity of a ring (not a cage):
Use of an amulet on the upper arm;
Allowance of clinching;
Use of Thai linament (but no other oils);
Low blow technicalities;
Definition of clean striking with the knees and elbows,[
Definition of damage
 
-Did the blow cause a retreat?
-Did it unbalance?
-Did it stop his attack?
-Did he show show pain?
-Was there visible damage like a cut?
Finish of fight – who looks fresh at end.
Unanimously passes

--

Unified Amateur Rules
Chaired by Andy Foster, GA
The Unified Amateur Rules Committee was a fighting dream team of experts including Dr. Sheryl Wulkan and Dr. Joseph Estwanik, Jeff Mullen who is an officiating dream team all by himself, Pat Reid, Brian Dunn, Dale Kliparchuk, the extraordinarily influential Nick Lembo, Dan Fitzgerald, and others, as well as taking feedback from amateur sanctioning bodies. The committee was tirelessly chaired by Andy Foster, who is a State commissioner, a former long-time professional MMA fighter, and an enormous advocate for MMA in a body that was originally created for the regulation of boxing.
It was repeatedly emphasized that regardless of the rules, the key to amateur MMA , above all, is that it is regulated. It was further pointed out that the amateurs need protection above all.
There was extended discussion by a large number of members over Unified Amateur Rules, including tiered rules changes, GnP, shin pads, prohibited submissions,
--
MMA Scoring Committee:
Chaired by Jeff Mullen, TN
The MMA scoring committee which includes Aaron Davis, Dr. Joseph Cooper PhD, Josef Mason, and Dale Kliparchuk focused on Half Point Scoring. The report detailed testing of the system in California. While there were reservations about aspects of the new system, the sentiment was very largely positive.

Big John McCarthy spoke to the membership and reminded that a bad judge is a bad judge under any scoring system, and proper training is the key.

There was wide agreement that the 10-Point Must system is appropriate for boxing, but not the exact right fit for MMA. That said, the introduction of an entirely new scoring system is a huge step, so the call was made for a further year of testing, with a request that some ACs step up and test Half Point Scoring in the pro ranks.

Several states, including Josef Mason in Colorado and Andy Foster in Georgia agreed to step and and test in the pro ranks what appears to be a better, but more complex system.
--
ABC Medical Committee Report
Dr. Sheryl Wulkan, chair
Policy on Licensing of contestants with a missing limb. 
Dr. Wulkan showed a profound, nuanced, professional understanding of the challenges faced by MMA fighters with missing limbs.

-Recommendation that potential licencees be evaluated on a case by case basis, using criteria including: 
Can they defend themselves effectively?

Can they be offensively effective against the fighter with whom they are matched?

Is there an increased medical risk?

-Several MMA fighters with missing limbs were identified, including Kyle Maynard whose bout was not cast in a positive light, and Nick Newell, who was identified as an excellent fighter, and whose licensing she would recommend.

-It was suggested that with the increase in war veterans with missing limbs, an amputation division might become a possibility for those prospective athletes whose participation is disallowed.

Medical Requirements for a contestant over 36
Older athlete may look fantastic, but can have underlying medical age-induced issues
Especially relevant to amateur competitors
Detailed recommended tests
Therapeutic Use Exemptions
TUE not the same as TRT (Testosterone Replacement Therapy)
TUE can be ADHD, Narcolepsy, Asthma, low testosterone, and more

Criteria
-Physicians’s Declaration
-Fighter’s Declaration
-Supporting Documentation
Recommend a committee that is independent of each other
--
UFC Attorney, former Nevada Deputy Attorney General Mike Mersch went over the civil and legal penalties for using an eight-sided cage in a mixed martial arts event. Mersch noted that an eight-sided cage is allowed for training purposes in the gym, but emphasized that an eight-sided cage CANNOT be used in a mixed martial arts contest [because the UFC has legal protection with the use of the Octagon for combat sports events.]